Review: Michael Cox, The Glass of Time

Mystery and Melodrama in Victorian England

Oct 9, 2008 Elizabeth Gregory

Michael Cox's second novel is a worthy sequel to the murderous events of his first, The Meaning of Night.

It is September 1876, just a few days after Esperanza Gorst’s nineteenth birthday. A successful interview with the 26th Baroness Tansor has led to her appointment as a lady’s maid at the country house of Evenwood, but unbeknownst to her new employer, Esperanza is not what she seems.

The "Great Task"

Equipped with a face impossible to forget and a set of faked references and recommendations, Esperanza is here to fulfil her role in a “Great Task”, a mission so secret that Esperanza herself is ignorant of its true purpose. All she knows is that her guardian Madame de l’Orme, with whom she has been living in France, has sent her over to England to secure the position of lady’s maid to the Baroness and record all that she sees and hears at Evenwood in her Book of Secrets “When I first came to Evenwood, the pages in my Book stood blank; but this, as I soon discovered, was a house of secrets, and the pages quickly began to fill” (Prologue).

The plot soon thickens in a suitably Victorian manner, with the Baroness’s two handsome sons vying for Esperanza’s attention, and the Lady herself alternating between excessive demonstrations of love and anger towards her young maid. Added to this, a series of newspaper clippings sent by Madame de l’Orme concerning the violent death of the Baroness’s husband-to-be some twenty-two years earlier suggest that this killing was perhaps not as clear-cut as at first thought.

Readers of Michael Cox’s first novel, The Meaning of Night, will already be familiar with Emily Carteret, now Lady Tansor, and her murdered fiancé. The second novel works as a stand-alone read, but to read the two books out of order would spoil the tightly plotted suspense of the first. Esperanza herself becomes aware of the true nature of Evenwood only by degrees, as she must wait for the final letter from three sent to her by Madame de L’Orme before she realises how she herself is a vital part of the story.

In the Tradition of Dickens & Collins

Fans of Cox’s debut will be pleased to find that the style of writing – densely worded prose much in the tradition of the Victorian novelist Wilkie Collins whom Miss Gorst so deeply admires – remains unchanged. The book abounds with good-natured clichés familiar to any reader of Victorian fiction: the early-morning mist rising from the grounds of the country house; the unfriendly housekeeper; the simple but likeable housemaid. These only add to the fun of the experience, as underneath it all lies a cracking story in the tradition of Dickens, conceived on a grand-scale and executed with theatrical flourish – it will have you hooked by the end of the first act.

The Glass of Time by Michael Cox is published in the UK by John Murray (2008), 531 pages, ISBN 978-0-7195-9720-6.

The copyright of the article Review: Michael Cox, The Glass of Time in British/UK Fiction is owned by Elizabeth Gregory. Permission to republish Review: Michael Cox, The Glass of Time in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
cover of Glass of Time, Amazon cover of Glass of Time
   
What do you think about this article?

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
post your comment
What is 5+2?

Comments

Nov 11, 2008 6:07 PM
Guest :
An excruciatingly predictable novel.
Nov 28, 2009 2:37 AM
Guest :
I agree, it was quite predictable, a bit too much for me at some pionts, as halfway through i almost talked myself into putting it down and leaving it where it lie. However as i previously read The Meaning Of Night, I renewed my faith with rememberence of this. As I thoroughly enjoyed that book. So I kept on. And I have to admit after only a short while at the beginning, i had noticed that Edward Glyver/Glapthorn were the same initials as Esperanza Gorst. Which i thought to be no small coincidence, and i was correct. And as such, none of the 'four secrets' shocked me in the least. All of what was said i had at least considered, if not completely expected. So needless to say. It was predictable. But that doesnt change my opinion that Michael Cox has a beautiful literary voice, one which i will dearly miss. I highly recommend the book, especially to those readers of The Meaning Of Night. As it was good to find out what happened. Though my friends, its hardly fair to compare the two in execution, I belive the first book to have been much better. But you will no doubt feel the need to finish the book if you read the first.
2 Comments